Security Vulnerabilities
- CVEs Published In March 2024
In Jenkins Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin 866.vdea_7dcd3008e and earlier, except 848.850.v6a_a_2a_234a_c81, when discovering pull requests from forks, the trust policy "Forks in the same account" allows changes to Jenkinsfiles from users without write access to the project when using Bitbucket Server.
Jenkins OWASP Dependency-Check Plugin 5.4.5 and earlier does not escape vulnerability metadata from Dependency-Check reports, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.
Jenkins MQ Notifier Plugin 1.4.0 and earlier logs potentially sensitive build parameters as part of debug information in build logs by default.
Jenkins AppSpider Plugin 1.0.16 and earlier does not perform permission checks in several HTTP endpoints, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to obtain information about available scan config names, engine group names, and client names.
Jenkins Build Monitor View Plugin 1.14-860.vd06ef2568b_3f and earlier does not escape Build Monitor View names, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to configure Build Monitor Views.
Jenkins GitBucket Plugin 0.8 and earlier does not sanitize Gitbucket URLs on build views, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to configure jobs.
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Subversion Partial Release Manager Plugin 1.0.1 and earlier allows attackers to trigger a build.
A missing permission check in Jenkins Subversion Partial Release Manager Plugin 1.0.1 and earlier allows attackers with Item/Read permission to trigger a build.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless APs could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks against an affected device. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials for the device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system.
A vulnerability in the web-based user interface of Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless APs could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform buffer overflow attacks against an affected device. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials for the device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system.