HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) had directories that were not linked or publicly visible but could be accessed directly. This could allow an increased risk of information disclosure or misuse of sensitive functionality.
HHCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by a Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This could lead to unauthorized changes or exposure of sensitive data.
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) application fails to strip EXIF metadata from uploaded images. This could lead to confidentiality and privacy risks if sensitive location information is unintentionally shared. .
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is affected by an Information Disclosure – Server Banner issue was identified. Exposed server banners may reveal software versions and system details, potentially aiding attackers in targeting known vulnerabilities.
HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking.
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) Discovery is vulnerable to unenforced encryption due to port 80 (HTTP) being open, allowing unencrypted access. An attacker with access to the network traffic can sniff packets from the connection and uncover the data.
HCL BigFix SM is affected by a Sensitive Information Exposure vulnerability where internal connections do not use TLS encryption which could allow an attacker unauthorized access to sensitive data transmitted between internal components.
HCL BigFix SM is affected by cryptographic weakness due to weak or outdated encryption algorithms. An attacker with network access could exploit this weakness to decrypt or manipulate encrypted communications under certain conditions.