IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to create arbitrary files due to path traversal during archive extraction.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to manipulate runtime caches and cause a denial of service due to an insecure direct object reference.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service by deleting arbitrary RabbitMQ queues or exchanges due to improper authorization.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 allows any authenticated tenant — with no project membership or role — fully controls scheme/host/port/path of an outbound fetch originating from a shared-infrastructure pod, and the WSDL body is reflected verbatim to the caller. The ds-canvas pod sits on the OpenShift overlay with reach to co-tenant services, in-cluster CP4D APIs, and link-local addresses. Scope is Changed, confidentiality High (response-reflecting), integrity Low (GET-only side-effects).
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 concatenates three caller-supplied strings into a String.format path on the shared /ds-storage RWX PVC and returns the file with no project ACL — pure IDOR plus traversal. Read is constrained to files named job.log/error.log, but DataStage job logs routinely carry connection strings, {dsnextenc} ciphertexts (decryptable via d2-f023), and customer-data row samples. This is the operator's tenant-to-tenant PVC-leakage threat verbatim; MEDIUM→HIGH via threat match.
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary Python code due to improper authorization of custom components in stored flows.
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper validation of command-line arguments in the MCP stdio server configuration.
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of user-controlled API endpoints.
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.